The Delhi High court reiterated that “The fact that the parties are operating in different lines of business may not be a good defence in an action brought by the Proprietor of a well-known mark. The well-known mark is said to be mark which signifies the certain...
The Supreme Court stated that – “….There is no doubt that the filing of a balance sheet in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act is mandatory, any transgression of the same being punishable by law. However, what is of importance is that notes that are...
The Supreme Court held that “nothing stands in the way of party autonomy in designating a seat of arbitration outside India even when both parties happen to be Indian Nationals, as has been held hereinabove.” Therefore, the Parties to a Contract who are Indian...
The Supreme Court stated while hearing an Appeal against the order of grant of bail that – “There is no doubt that liberty is important, even that of a person charged with crime but it is important for the courts to recognize the potential threat to the life and...
The Supreme Court affirmed that testimony of a prosecutrix with a disability, or of a disabled witness for that matter , cannot be considered weak or inferior, only because such an individual interacts with the world in a different manner, vis-à-vis their able-bodied...
Recent Comments