The Supreme Court held that “The evidence produced by the plaintiff is payment of rent by either Ram Sewak Ram or by the grandfather of the plaintiff. Such payment of rent is not indicative of the fact that the hotel business was by the joint…
The Supreme Court held that “The evidence produced by the plaintiff is payment of rent by either Ram Sewak Ram or by the grandfather of the plaintiff. Such payment of rent is not indicative of the fact that the hotel business was by the joint…
The Supreme Court while hearing the appeal for the compassionate appointment of the son of a missing employee who was declared dead by the Civil Court held that “….we are convinced that the Respondent’s son cannot be given compassionate appointment at this point of time.…
The Supreme Court while considering the appeal against the order of rejection of bail application stated that “…. We have gone through the material on record and are satisfied that the Appellant is entitled for bail and that the Special Court and High Court erred…
The Supreme Court held that “A suit for specific performance cannot be dismissed on the sole ground of delay or laches. However, an exception to this rule is where an immovable property is to be sold within a certain period, time being of the essence,…
The Supreme Court while deciding the manner in which the vacancies are to be filled held that “The question arises as to at which stage would Section 27 of the Act operates, and where in the list, the application of the “first” principle would apply.…
The Supreme Court held that “Indeed, an analysis of Section 2(1)(f) would show that whatever be the transaction between the parties, if it happens to be entered into between persons, at least one of whom is either a foreign national, or habitually resident in, any…
The Supreme Court stated that “thus, as per Section 210 Cr.P.C., when in a case instituted otherwise than on a police report, i.e., in a complaint case, during the course of the inquiry or trial held by the Magistrate, it appears to the Magistrate that…
The Supreme Court held that “Since the corporate debtor would be covered by the moratorium provision contained in Section 14 of the IBC, by which continuation of Section 138/141 proceedings against the corporate debtor and initiation of Section 138/141 proceedings against the said debtor during…
The Supreme Court held while hearing an appeal against the order of quashing the FIR by the High Court that “We are unable to appreciate the reasoning that the provision incorporated in the agreement for referring the disputes to arbitration is an effective substitute for…
The Supreme Court reiterated that “In our view, having due regard to the nature and ambit of Section 311 of the CrPC, it was appropriate and proper that the applications filed by the prosecution ought to have been allowed. Section 311 provides that any Court…
DISCLAIMER
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. The user acknowledges the following:
There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website. The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use.
The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.