The Supreme Court in Compack Enterprises India (P) Ltd. Versus Beant Singh, dated 17.02.21, reiterated that “It is well settled that consent decrees are intended to create estoppels by judgment against the parties, thereby putting an end to further litigation between the parties. Resultantly, this Court has held that it would be slow…
The Supreme Court in Amitabha Dasgupta Versus United Bank of India & Ors., dated 19.02.21 held that “In the present case, the Respondent bank has not disputed their negligence in breaking open the locker in spite of clearance of rental dues by the Appellant. However, the number…
The Supreme Court in Kotak Mahindra Bank Pvt. Ltd. Versus Ambuj A. Kasliwal & Ors., dated 16.02.21 reiterated that “It is noticed that this Court while considering an analogous provision contained in Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest…
The Constitutional bench of Supreme Court in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. versus Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd., (2020) 5 SCC 757, held that “District Forum has no power to extend the time for filing the response to the complaint beyond the period of 15 days …
The Supreme Court in Upendra Choudhury Versus Bulandshahar Development Authority & Ors., dated 11.02.21, reiterated that “it would be inappropriate to entertain a petition under Article 32 for more than one reason. There are specific statutory provisions holding the field, including among them: (i) The Consumer Protection…
The Supreme Court in State of Odisha vs. Banabihari Mohapatra & Anr, dated 12.02.21, reiterated that “As held by this Court in Sadhu Saran Singh v. State of U.P. reported in 2016 (4) SCC 357, an appeal against acquittal has always been on an altogether different…
The Supreme Court in Ravinder Nath Agarwal vs. Yogender Nath Agarwal, dated 12.02.21, held that “A cumulative reading of Sections 57, 213 and 264 would show: (i) that a person claiming to be an executor or legatee under a Will cannot rely upon the Will, in any…
The Supreme Court in Chintels India Ltd. Vs. Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd., dated 11.02.21, held that “Consequently, the question of law is answered by stating that an appeal under section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act, 1996 would be maintainable against an order refusing to condone delay in…
The Supreme Court in M/s. Kalamani Tex & Anr. Vs. P. Balasubramanian, dated 10.02.2021, held that “Even if we take the arguments raised by the appellants at face value that only a blank cheque and signed blank stamp papers were given to the respondent, yet the statutory…
Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Ltd. Versus Essar Bulk Terminal Ltd., AIR 2021 SC 4350 The Supreme Court on application under section 9 of Arbitration Act in Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Ltd. Versus Essar Bulk Terminal Ltd., AIR 2021 SC 4350 held that: “It…
DISCLAIMER
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. The user acknowledges the following:
There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website. The user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use.
The information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
