The Supreme Court held that “Bearing in mind the tests which have been enunciated in the above decision, we are of the view that even assuming that all the allegations in the FIR are correct for the purposes of considering the application for quashing under Section 482 of CrPC, no offence has been established. There is no allegation to the effect that the promise to marry given to the second respondent was false at the inception. On the contrary, it would appear from the contents of the FIR that there was a subsequent refusal on the part of the appellant to marry the second respondent which gave rise to the registration of the FIR. On these facts, we are of the view that the High Court was in error in declining to entertain the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. on the basis that it was only the evidence at trial which would lead to a determination as to whether an offence was established.

Sonu @ Subahsh Kumar Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., dated March 1, 2021.